扣帽子！魁北克PEQ面试者收到5级以下正式拒信

@333：如果被魁省扣上misleading的帽子就是他们认定我们虚假陈述了，misleading导致的就是change process or final decision了，多读一下法律条款就知道了，好多内容，我不是专业人事，只是最近担心这个问题所以在网上看的资料多。联邦不是光看我们的解释拒签理由的，他会调查为什么被拒，如果魁省扣的帽子说我们mislead他们了就是虚假陈述，虚假陈述的范围特别广，得问律师的，我问的律师给我的解释就是misrepresentation can be established just if an officer has reasonable grounds to believe(lower than the normal civil standard of "balance of probability") this has occurred...
the misrepresentation does need to have masked a ground for refusal. It is not necessary to show that the hidden information would have made the individual inadmissible,and; the misrepresentation is material simply if it averts or discourages a line of inquiry.


这下面的是我在各个案例中找到的移民法对虚假陈述的定义，这种深奥的法律条文我只能从字面上理解意识，深入的含义还得咨询专业律师，我原来就是想找出对我们有利的法律条文和case，希望大家共同努力度过难关，有信息及时分享：

The Court held that the correct interpretation of Section 40(1)(c) was that the term “misrepresentation” should be read as denoting states of fact which operate to make a person inadmissible and that, if any of the events mentioned in the Section are proved to have occurred, the person is considered or deemed inadmissible for misrepresentation.

(a) directly or indirectly misrepresent or withhold material facts relating to a relevant matter that induces or could induce an error in the administration of this Act;
(b) communicate, directly or indirectly, by any means, false or misleading information or declarations with intent to induce or deter immigration to Canada”
(c) refuse to be sworn or to affirm or declare, as the case may be, or to answer
9 a question put to the person at an examination or at a proceeding held under this Act.
This broad language appears to be a deliberate attempt to encompass almost any form of misrepresentation or withholding or information by anyone, including an applicant, employer or third party representative. However, the use of the qualifying word “knowingly” would suggest a high threshold to be met in any prosecution.

@333：也希望猴哥找个好律师来给大家普法一下，大家可以签名凑钱的，总不盲目的担心好。